All articles

A development team as a subscription gives you continuous software delivery at a fixed monthly price — you pay for what gets delivered, not for hours or presence.

If your vendor disappeared tomorrow, how long before anyone else could take over your systems? The answer rarely comes down to the code. It comes down to who owns the memory of the work.

Peter Pang at CREAO put words to something we live every day: the difference between adding AI to an existing process and rebuilding the process from the ground up around AI agents.

Tools like Claude Code and Codex are fantastic for individual developers. But how do you scale that to an organization? That's the question our platform Fae — Full Agentic Enterprise — tries to answer.

A complete development team at a fixed monthly cost — one human and AI agents delivering the equivalent of a traditional team, at a fraction of the cost.

Three fundamentally different ways of working with AI in development: autocomplete, vibe coding, and agentic development. The difference between using AI and being AI-first.

Concrete examples of the AI-first effect: a project estimated at 26-62 hours delivered in 4. And why maintenance projects become even more efficient than greenfield.

Faster delivery, real cost savings without offshore risks, quality where the human steers, and a partner who stays a step ahead in the AI wave. The concrete benefits of working with an AI-first consultancy.

We answer the questions about Agent Assisted Development (AAD), code quality, repeatability, and business model after announcing that Wizardworks no longer charges for programming.

Wizardworks is going AI-first. We no longer charge for programming. We charge for what actually requires accountability, judgment, and presence. AI-shore instead of off-shore.